2025 NHL Draft Grades: Expert Analysis & Insights

The moment a name is called at the NHL Entry Draft, the analysis begins. Fans and front offices alike hold their breath, but the immediate reaction is just the start of a multi-year evaluation. The process of assigning NHL draft grades is far more complex than simply comparing a player's draft position to their pre-draft ranking. It’s an intricate blend of art and science, where scouting reports, statistical models, and organizational needs collide to form a final verdict. Understanding these grades requires looking beyond a simple letter score and digging into the methodology behind it.

Different experts and media outlets bring unique philosophies to the table. Some prioritise drafting for high-end skill and offensive upside, while others reward teams for accumulating value through multiple picks or addressing specific positional weaknesses. A grade from a fantasy-focused analyst might look very different from one produced by a scout who values two-way play and defensive responsibility. This variance is crucial; it highlights the subjective nature of projecting the careers of 18-year-old athletes and reveals what each evaluator values most in a prospect.

This roundup demystifies the process by dissecting the grading systems of seven major hockey authorities. We will explore how each outlet arrives at their conclusions, providing a comprehensive look at the rationale behind their team-by-team report cards. By examining the distinct approaches of sources like TSN, The Athletic, and Elite Prospects, you will gain a deeper appreciation for the long-term strategies at play. This isn't just about celebrating the winners and losers on draft day; it's about equipping you with the knowledge to critically assess your favourite team's performance and understand what truly constitutes a successful draft class.

1. TSN Draft Grade Analysis

When discussing nhl draft grades, TSN's comprehensive analysis is often the gold standard for fans and analysts alike. Popularized by a panel of respected hockey insiders like Bob McKenzie and Craig Button, this grading system is one of the most referenced post-draft evaluations. It offers an immediate, yet deeply researched, verdict on each team's performance.

The strength of the TSN model lies in its multi-faceted approach. It goes beyond simply ranking the "best player available" (BPA) and dives into the strategic nuances of each organization's draft class. The final letter grade, ranging from A+ to D-, is a synthesis of expert opinion, prospect valuation, and how well the selections align with a team's specific positional needs and development pipeline.

How TSN's Grading System Works

TSN's evaluation process is built on three core pillars:

• Expert Panel Analysis: The grades are heavily influenced by the collective wisdom of TSN's hockey experts. Their decades of experience scouting amateur talent provide invaluable context, weighing a prospect's raw skill against their projectability to the NHL level.
• Individual Pick Value: Each selection is scrutinized. Did a team get good value for their draft slot? Reaching for a player projected to go much later will negatively impact their grade, while securing a highly-ranked prospect who fell can provide a significant boost.
• Organizational Need Assessment: This is a crucial differentiator. TSN considers a team's current roster and prospect pool. Drafting a high-end goaltender when the system is already stocked with them might be viewed less favourably than addressing a long-standing need for a top-four defenceman.

This infographic breaks down the core components of TSN's analytical framework.

As the visualization highlights, the final grade is a balanced score, reflecting not just the talent acquired but the strategic intelligence behind the selections.

Notable Examples of TSN's Grades

History provides clear examples of their methodology in action. The New Jersey Devils received an A+ in 2019 for the straightforward but essential selection of consensus first-overall pick Jack Hughes. In 2020, the Ottawa Senators earned an A- for a foundational draft that netted them Tim Stützle and Jake Sanderson, addressing critical needs for elite skill and defensive stability. Similarly, the Buffalo Sabres' B+ in 2021 for selecting Owen Power reflected a solid, franchise-altering pick that perfectly matched their organizational requirements for a number one defenceman. These examples underscore TSN's emphasis on both top-tier talent acquisition and strategic team-building.

2. The Athletic's Draft Report Card System

When it comes to deeply analytical nhl draft grades, The Athletic's report card system has become an indispensable resource for the modern hockey fan. Led by renowned prospect experts like Corey Pronman and Scott Wheeler, their coverage offers a granular, multi-layered evaluation that blends traditional scouting with data-driven insights. It provides an immediate post-draft reaction while setting the stage for long-term re-evaluation.

The key strength of The Athletic's model is its detailed, report-card format. Instead of just a single letter grade, it breaks down a team's performance into specific categories, offering a more nuanced and comprehensive verdict on their draft weekend. This approach gives readers a clear understanding of the highs, lows, and overall strategic direction of each franchise's draft class.

How The Athletic's Grading System Works

The Athletic’s assessment is structured around a multi-point report card, evaluating distinct facets of a team's draft strategy:

• Best and Worst Pick Analysis: This pinpoints specific selections that represent exceptional value or questionable reaches. It provides context for why a pick was strong, like landing a top-10 talent at pick 20, or weak, such as selecting an off-the-board prospect in the second round.
• Sleeper Pick Identification: The experts highlight a late-round selection with high upside who could outperform their draft position. This element adds a forward-looking perspective, encouraging fans to track prospects beyond the initial rounds.
• Overall Strategy and Future Outlook: This component synthesizes the entire draft class. It evaluates whether the selections align with the team's prospect pool, addresses organizational needs, and how the draft-day trades impacted their overall asset management. The final grade reflects this holistic view.

This detailed breakdown provides a more complete picture, showing that even a team with a questionable first-round pick can redeem their draft with intelligent selections in later rounds.

Notable Examples of The Athletic's Grades

The Athletic's methodology is well-documented through its annual draft coverage. In 2020, the Los Angeles Kings earned a solid A grade for a foundational class headlined by Quinton Byfield at second overall, supplemented by a deep pool of quality prospects. The Colorado Avalanche received an A- in 2019 for smartly selecting top defenceman Bowen Byram at fourth overall, a move that perfectly matched their organizational need for a future cornerstone on the blue line. More recently, the expansion Seattle Kraken were given a B+ for their inaugural 2021 draft, a grade reflecting a sensible, volume-based approach to building their prospect system from scratch. These grades highlight The Athletic's focus on both high-end talent acquisition and coherent, long-term team building strategy.

3. NHL.com Official Draft Analysis

When evaluating nhl draft grades, the official league website, NHL.com, provides an authoritative perspective that is essential for a complete picture. Popularized by a team of dedicated analysts like Mike Morreale and Adam Kimelman, this analysis offers an immediate post-draft reaction, deeply rooted in the league's own scouting intelligence from NHL Central Scouting. It serves as a valuable baseline, presenting grades with an insider’s view.

The strength of the NHL.com model is its direct access to team personnel and official scouting reports. Their analysis often synthesizes not just the talent of the prospects selected, but also the publicly stated reasoning from general managers and head scouts. This provides fans with a clear understanding of the "why" behind each pick, connecting the selections to the organization's overarching strategy.

How NHL.com's Grading System Works

The evaluation process at NHL.com is grounded in official data and direct team insights, focusing on three key elements:

• Central Scouting Alignment: The grades are heavily informed by the final rankings from NHL Central Scouting. A team's draft class is often measured against these official pre-draft benchmarks, assessing whether they secured players around, above, or below their projected draft positions.
• Team Strategy and Rationale: NHL.com analysts incorporate direct quotes and explanations from team executives. This provides context on whether a team was drafting for positional need, targeting a specific attribute like size or speed, or simply adhering to a "best player available" philosophy.
• Long-Term Projectability: Beyond the immediate grade, the analysis frequently discusses the development path for key prospects. It considers how a player fits into a team's future plans and the timeline for their potential NHL impact, offering a more forward-looking assessment.

This video provides an inside look at the draft process, highlighting the types of discussions and decisions that influence these grades.

As the video shows, the journey from amateur prospect to NHL regular is complex, and NHL.com's grades attempt to capture the initial promise of that journey. Understanding this process can add significant context, especially when you Learn more about how the NHL lottery draft works and its impact on team-building.

Notable Examples of NHL.com's Grades

The site's history of analysis showcases its focus on team-specific context. In 2021, the Anaheim Ducks received high marks for selecting Mason McTavish, a player praised by NHL.com for his NHL-ready frame and leadership qualities that perfectly matched the team's need for a future centrepiece. The 2019 analysis of the Chicago Blackhawks' selection of Kirby Dach highlighted the team's strategic choice to prioritize size and skill at the centre position. Similarly, their 2020 breakdown of the Tampa Bay Lightning’s draft praised the organization’s ability to find value in later rounds, a key part of their sustained success. These examples demonstrate NHL.com’s emphasis on how each pick aligns with a franchise's specific goals and vision.

4. Elite Prospects Draft Grades

When it comes to analytically-driven nhl draft grades, Elite Prospects offers a data-rich perspective that appeals to the modern hockey fan and statistical analyst. Popularized by their extensive scouting network and robust database, their grading system provides a quantitative evaluation of each team's draft performance, heavily weighting their own proprietary prospect rankings. It offers a detailed, value-based verdict that often highlights hidden gems and strategic victories.

The strength of the Elite Prospects model is its foundation in data and expected value. It moves beyond subjective opinion to measure performance against a baseline of pre-draft rankings, focusing on the value extracted from each draft position. The final grade is less about fulfilling needs and more about a team’s ability to identify and secure talent that outperforms their draft slot, providing a unique lens through which to view draft success.

How Elite Prospects' Grading System Works

Elite Prospects' evaluation process is built on three analytical pillars:

• Proprietary Rankings as a Benchmark: The grades are anchored by the Elite Prospects Consolidated Ranking, which aggregates rankings from numerous public sources. A team's performance is measured by how their picks deviate from this established consensus.
• Expected Value Analysis: Each draft pick has an expected value based on historical outcomes from that position. Elite Prospects assesses whether a team exceeded or fell short of this value. Drafting a player ranked 50th at pick number 30 is a loss of value, while selecting a player ranked 40th at pick number 60 is a significant win.
• International Scouting Integration: With a deep network in Europe, their analysis places a strong emphasis on international prospects. This provides a more global and often contrarian view compared to North American-centric evaluations, rewarding teams that successfully scout overseas talent.

This systematic approach allows for a highly objective assessment, focusing purely on talent acquisition and value creation throughout all seven rounds of the draft.

Notable Examples of Elite Prospects' Grades

Their data-first methodology often highlights different success stories. In 2020, the Detroit Red Wings were praised for consistently exceeding expected value, landing players like Lucas Raymond and William Wallinder later than their rankings suggested. The 2021 evaluation of the Edmonton Oilers' draft was noted for its alignment with analytical models, prioritizing players with strong underlying metrics. In 2019, the Vegas Golden Knights' selection of Pavel Dorofeyev was flagged as a high-value pick, reflecting their strong international scouting focus which Elite Prospects' system is well-equipped to appreciate. These examples showcase a focus on teams that find inefficiencies and outperform the market. For those interested in advanced metrics, understanding concepts like Wins Above Replacement is also beneficial. Learn more about how advanced stats evaluate player impact.

5. Sportsnet Draft Report Cards

As a major Canadian broadcaster, Sportsnet's analysis offers a crucial perspective on nhl draft grades, often with a unique focus on how selections impact Canadian franchises. Led by prominent voices like Jeff Marek and Sam Cosentino, their Draft Report Cards blend traditional letter grades with accessible, narrative-driven analysis. This approach provides a clear verdict on each team's draft class while explaining the strategic thinking behind the picks.

The value of Sportsnet's evaluation comes from its balance between expert scouting insight and storytelling. They excel at contextualizing picks, explaining not just a player's skill set but also how that player fits into a team's long-term vision and current organizational needs. Their report cards are designed to be easily digestible for a broad audience, from seasoned followers to casual fans, making complex draft strategies understandable.

How Sportsnet's Grading System Works

Sportsnet's grading methodology is centred around a few key principles that shape their final report card:

• Execution of Strategy: A central theme is whether a team successfully executed its pre-draft plan. Did they target specific needs, trade up for a coveted player, or accumulate assets effectively? This focus on strategic execution is a hallmark of their analysis.
• Narrative and Impact: The panel assesses the immediate impact and story behind the picks. They weigh the public perception and potential controversy of a selection, analyzing how it affects the organization's reputation and fan base.
• Talent vs. Need Fulfillment: While talent is paramount, Sportsnet places significant emphasis on how well a team addressed its most pressing organizational needs. A draft class that fills critical gaps in the prospect pipeline will often receive a higher grade.

This framework allows for a nuanced grade that considers both the on-ice potential and the off-ice strategic manoeuvres. The analysis is particularly useful for understanding how draft choices influence a team's direction, a concept that also applies when building your own roster. If you're looking to apply similar principles, you can explore more about fantasy hockey draft strategy to sharpen your team-building skills.

Notable Examples of Sportsnet's Grades

Sportsnet’s grading history reflects their focus on strategy and narrative. The Montreal Canadiens received a B+ in 2021, a grade that was heavily influenced by the controversial selection of Logan Mailloux and how the organization managed the situation. In 2020, the Toronto Maple Leafs earned an A- for selecting Rodion Amirov, a pick praised for its high-skill upside and strong value in the middle of the first round.

Similarly, the Calgary Flames' B grade in 2019 for drafting Jakob Pelletier was justified by the selection's perfect alignment with their need for skilled, high-character forwards who could contribute to the team's identity. These examples demonstrate how Sportsnet’s nhl draft grades provide a comprehensive view, rewarding teams for both acquiring talent and executing a coherent, well-defined strategy.

6. Dobber Prospects Draft Analysis

For those whose interest in nhl draft grades extends into the world of fantasy sports, Dobber Prospects provides a specialized and invaluable perspective. Popularized by Dobber Hockey and the broader fantasy community, this grading system evaluates draft classes not just on their real-world NHL potential, but on their long-term fantasy value. It offers a unique lens, focusing on offensive upside and the statistical categories that win championships in dynasty leagues.

The strength of the Dobber Prospects model is its targeted analysis for a specific audience. While traditional evaluations balance all positions and player types, this approach prioritizes players with the highest potential to produce points, power-play time, and other key fantasy metrics. The final grades, often accompanied by in-depth player profiles, are a synthesis of upside projection, offensive skill, and a player's likely deployment at the NHL level.

How Dobber Prospects' Grading System Works

Dobber Prospects' evaluation is built on three core pillars tailored for fantasy success:

• Long-Term Fantasy Value: The grades are heavily weighted toward a player's projected fantasy impact over their career. This means prioritizing high-ceiling offensive talents over safer, two-way players who may have a solid NHL career but limited statistical output.
• Offensive Upside: Each pick is analyzed for its potential to become a significant point-producer. A team that drafts multiple high-skill forwards, even if they are riskier prospects, may receive a higher grade than a team that opts for safe, low-ceiling defensive players.
• NHL Deployment Probability: This factor considers how a player is likely to be used by their NHL organization. Prospects with a clear path to top-six forward roles or top power-play units are valued more highly, as this deployment is critical for maximizing fantasy production.

This framework provides a clear path for fantasy GMs to assess which NHL teams truly improved their future fantasy stock on draft day.

Notable Examples of Dobber Prospects' Grades

Dobber's unique focus is evident in their historical analysis. The New York Rangers received an A+ in 2020 for selecting Alexis Lafrenière, a prospect whose offensive ceiling was seen as a future cornerstone for fantasy dynasties. This grade was based purely on his immense point-production potential.

In 2019, the Vancouver Canucks' draft was praised for its focus on offensive upside, securing players like Vasily Podkolzin and Nils Hoglander, who projected as dynamic fantasy assets. Conversely, their 2021 analysis of the Pittsburgh Penguins' draft highlighted a safer, lower-upside strategy, which, while logical for the NHL team, offered less excitement and long-term value for fantasy managers. These examples show how Dobber's nhl draft grades cater specifically to those building for fantasy hockey glory.

7. Hockey News Draft Grades

When it comes to nhl draft grades, The Hockey News (THN) offers a perspective steeped in decades of journalistic tradition and scouting expertise. As one of the most established and respected publications in the sport, their post-draft analysis provides a trusted voice for fans seeking a thorough evaluation of their team's performance. Their grading system is a hallmark of their comprehensive draft coverage.

The strength of The Hockey News's model is its balanced blend of traditional scouting and modern analysis. It prioritizes on-ice performance, hockey sense, and character, while also acknowledging the value of underlying analytics. The final letter grade, typically from A+ to F, reflects an aggregate opinion from their network of scouts and writers on how effectively a team managed its assets and addressed its needs.

How The Hockey News's Grading System Works

THN's evaluation process is built on three core pillars that reflect its deep roots in the hockey world:

• Scout-Driven Prospect Quality: The grades are heavily influenced by the insights of THN's extensive scouting network. They assess not just a player's skill set, but also intangible qualities like hockey IQ, compete level, and character, which are often harder to quantify but crucial for NHL success.
• Draft Execution and Asset Management: Each pick is analyzed within the context of the draft board. Did a team reach for a player, or did they secure a prospect who fell? THN scrutinizes trades made on the draft floor and how teams leverage their draft capital to maximize value throughout all seven rounds.
• Organizational Philosophy and Fit: This is a key component of their analysis. THN evaluates how well the draft class aligns with the team's established identity and long-term strategy. A team known for its rugged, defensive style might be praised for drafting players who fit that mould, even if they aren't the flashiest prospects available.

Notable Examples of THN's Grades

History provides clear examples of their methodology in action. The Florida Panthers' skill-first approach in the 2020 draft earned them high marks for selecting Anton Lundell and other high-octane offensive talents, aligning perfectly with their organizational shift towards speed and creativity. In 2021, THN's evaluation of the Washington Capitals' draft highlighted their focus on character and leadership, recognizing the value of adding players who fit the team's veteran, win-now culture. Following their championship in 2019, the St. Louis Blues' draft was analyzed for how well it restocked the prospect pipeline to sustain their hard-nosed, heavy style of play. These examples underscore THN's focus on both prospect quality and strategic organizational alignment.

NHL Draft Grade Comparison of Top 7 Sources

Draft Analysis	Implementation Complexity 🔄	Resource Requirements 🔄	Expected Outcomes 📊	Ideal Use Cases 💡	Key Advantages ⭐
TSN Draft Grade Analysis	Medium - multi-expert panels, real-time grading	High - expert panel, ongoing analysis	Balanced grades reflecting immediate impact and fit	Teams needing a blend of expert opinion and organizational fit	Combines expert views; detailed rationale
The Athletic's Draft Report Card	High - multi-category grading, long-term follow ups	Very High - analytics + scouting + regional experts	Comprehensive grades with multi-year accountability	Detailed, long-term draft strategy evaluation	Multi-faceted; integrates analytics & scouting
NHL.com Official Draft Analysis	Medium - official scout & exec input with video	Medium - access to execs and scouts	Official perspective with immediate post-draft insights	Baseline for official league views and media coverage	Official authority; executive interviews
Elite Prospects Draft Grades	High - statistical modeling, expected value calc.	High - data-driven analytics, modeling expertise	Objective, quantitative draft value assessment	Analytical focus on draft value and international prospects	Data-driven; reduces bias; consistent method
Sportsnet Draft Report Cards	Medium - letter grades + narrative	Medium - expert panel with fan focus	Accessible, fan-friendly grades with strategy focus	Canadian market with balance between traditional & modern	Accessible; Canadian market focus; multiple viewpoints
Dobber Prospects Draft Analysis	Medium - fantasy-centric, projection models	Medium - fantasy stats & analytics	Fantasy value-oriented grades focusing on long-term impact	Fantasy hockey drafts and dynasty league player valuation	Unique fantasy perspective; long-term projections
Hockey News Draft Grades	Medium - traditional scouting + analytics	Medium - scout network and historical data	Reliable traditional grades emphasizing fit and execution	Traditional hockey evaluations valuing character & culture	Established authority; balanced traditional & modern

Synthesizing the Grades for a Clearer Picture

Evaluating NHL draft grades is less about finding a single, definitive answer and more about building a comprehensive, multi-faceted perspective. As we've explored, each source, from TSN's consensus-driven analysis to Dobber Prospects' fantasy-focused lens, offers a unique piece of the puzzle. Relying on just one report card provides a snapshot, but synthesizing them all creates a panoramic view of a team's future.

The immediate post-draft period is filled with optimism and speculation. However, the true measure of a draft class isn't found in the initial letter grade assigned on a Saturday in June; it’s revealed over the subsequent three to five years. The journey from a promising prospect to an impactful NHL player is long and filled with variables. This is where the real analysis begins.

From Speculation to Substantive Analysis

The initial NHL draft grades are fundamentally predictive. They assess a general manager's strategy, the perceived value of each pick, and how well a team addressed its organisational needs. Yet, the most insightful fans and analysts understand that this is just the starting line.

To truly grasp the success of a draft, one must transition from post-draft reactions to ongoing developmental tracking. Consider these key takeaways as you move forward:

• Embrace the Mosaic Approach: No single grading system is infallible. By combining the data-driven insights from sources like The Athletic with the scouting-based evaluations from Elite Prospects or Sportsnet, you can form a more nuanced and robust opinion. A team graded 'A' for value by one outlet and 'C' for addressing needs by another tells a complex story.
• Context is King: A late-round pick who develops into a reliable third-pairing defenceman can be a monumental success for one franchise, while a top-five pick who becomes a second-line forward might be viewed as a disappointment for another. The context of draft position and organisational depth charts is critical when evaluating long-term outcomes.
• Patience is a Virtue: The most crucial takeaway from any review of NHL draft grades is the need for patience. A player's development path is rarely linear. Prospects develop at different rates, facing challenges and breakthroughs along the way. Re-evaluating a draft class three, five, and even seven years later provides the most accurate assessment.

Turning Grades into Actionable Insight

So, how can you apply this deeper understanding? Beyond simply reading the reports, you can actively track the prospects that intrigue you. Follow their progress in their respective leagues, whether it’s the CHL, NCAA, or European professional leagues. Pay attention to how their skills translate as they advance to higher levels of competition, such as the AHL.

This active engagement transforms you from a passive consumer of draft grades into an informed observer of player development. You will begin to notice trends, identify sleepers who outperform their draft slot, and appreciate the intricate art of team building. Understanding the long-term nature of the NHL draft doesn't diminish the excitement of the initial grades; it enhances it by adding layers of depth and anticipation. The final verdict on these draft classes is yet to be written, and you are now better equipped to follow along as each chapter unfolds.

---

Ready to move beyond initial speculation and track these prospects with real data? PuckNStick provides the advanced analytics and player development tracking tools you need to see how draft picks are actually progressing. Turn your post-draft analysis into a data-backed evaluation by visiting PuckNStick today.